Asset Correlation and the Optimal Portfolio Size Determination – Case of Nifty 50 and NASDAQ 100 Indices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17010/ijrcm/2022/v9i1/170400Keywords:
portfolio diversification
, correlation structure, optimal portfolio size, foreign portfolio investors.JEL Classification Codes
, G11, G15, F34Paper Submission Date
, January 25, 2022, Paper sent back for Revision, February 11, Paper Acceptance Date, February 25, 2022.Abstract
Portfolio diversification benefits and optimum portfolio size depend on the internal correlation structure of the market. Investors require a small number of assets to get the maximum diversification benefit in a highly correlated market, however, such a market offers relatively lesser diversification opportunities. In the present study, the correlation for stock returns in India and the US was calculated to determine the optimal size of portfolios in the respective markets. Returns for all stocks indexed in NIFTY 50 and NASDAQ 100 were considered for calculating average correlations for Indian and U.S. markets between 2017 and 2019. The results showed higher correlations for the NASDAQ 100 in comparison to Nifty 50, indicating relatively better diversification opportunities provided by the Indian market as compared to the U.S. However, lower correlations for Nifty 50 required a larger number of assets to be included in the portfolio to diversify the unsystematic risk. Correlations between Nifty-50 and Nasdaq-100 indices for the past three years 2017–19 were also calculated. The results showed a relatively low correlation between the two indices, which is good for international diversification opportunities. In addition, the present study established a relationship of correlation structure between the two indices and foreign capital inflows in India for the respective years. This study also captured the cross-country returns and risks for the Indian and the U.S market.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
References
Agrawal, P. K., Nandan, T., & Singh, A. P. (2020). Stock market integration with special reference to India: A review of the literature. Indian Journal of Research in Capital Markets, 7(2–3), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijrcm/2020/v7i2-3/154514
Chan, L., Karceski, J., & Lakonishok, J. (1999). On portfolio estimation: Forecasting covariance and choosing the risk model. The Review of Financial Studies, 12(5), 937–974. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/12.5.937
Dungey, M., Milunovich, G., & Thorp, S. (2008). Unobservable shocks as carriers of contagion: A dynamic analysis using identified structural GARCH (NCER Working Paper Series 22). https://ideas.repec.org/p/qut/auncer/2008-11.html
Elton, E. J., Gruber, M. J., & Urich, T. J. (1978). Are betas best? The Journal of Finance, 33(5), 1375–1384. https://doi.org/10.2307/2327272
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1997). Industry costs of equity. Journal of Financial Economics, 43(2), 153–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(96)00896-3
Green, R. C. (1986). Positively weighted portfolios on the minimum-variance frontier. The Journal of Finance, 41(5), 1051–1068. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1986.tb02530.x
Grubel, H. G. (1968). Internationally diversified portfolios: Welfare gains and capital flows. The American Economic Review, 58(5), 1299–1314. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1814029
Joshi, H. (2017). Why the global equity allocation in frontier market is low? Evidence from Vietnam. Indian Journal of Research in Capital Markets, 4(3), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijrcm/2017/v4/i3/118911
Lakshmanasamy, T. (2021). The causal relationship between volatility in crude oil price, exchange rate, and stock price in India: GARCH estimation of spillover effects. Indian Journal of Research in Capital Markets, 8(3), 8–21. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijrcm/2021/v8i3/167954
Levy, H., & Sarnat, M. (1970). International diversification of investment portfolios. The American Economic Review, 60(4), 668–675. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1818410
Litterman, R., & Winkelmann, K. (1998). Estimating covariance matrices. In, Risk management series. Goldman Sachs & Company.
Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1952.tb01525.x
Meric, G., Pati, N., & Meric, I. (2011). Co-movements of the Indian stock market with other stock markets: Implications for portfolio diversification. Indian Journal of Finance, 5(10), 13–20. http://www.indianjournaloffinance.co.in/index.php/IJF/article/view/72477
Mo, G., Zhang, W., Tan, C., & Liu, X. (2022). Predicting the portfolio risk of high-dimensional international stock indices with dynamic spatial dependence, The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 59, Article Number 101570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2021.101570
Perumandla, S., & Kurisetti, P. (2018). Time-varying correlations, causality, and volatility linkages of Indian commodity and equity markets: Evidence from DCC-GARCH. Indian Journal of Finance, 12(9), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2018/v12i9/131558
Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. The Journal of Finance, 19(3), 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1964.tb02865.x
Sharpe, W. F. (1974). Imputing expected security returns from portfolio composition. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 9(3), 463–472. https://doi.org/10.2307/2329873
Solnik, B. H. (1974). Why not diversify internationally rather than domestically? Financial Analyst Journal, 30(4), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v30.n4.48
Srinivasa, S. P., & George, S. (2016). Market sentiment dynamics and return volatility in the Indian equity market. Indian Journal of Finance, 10(6), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2016/v10i6/94872
Wong, W-K., Agarwal. A., & Du, J. (2005). Financial integration for Indian stock market, a fractional cointegration approach (Working Paper No. WP 0501). Department of Economics, National University of Singapore.
